Alert - Allan Grandy, StrataCo Property Management of Burnaby BC

Update: March 22, 2026

Reports have been submitted concerning repeated instances of unauthorized contact and privacy violations by suspect entities in possession of confidential owner information from Corbeau BCS2460. These entities are alleged to have engaged in intimidation and coercive tactics against homeowners exercising their lawful rights. Source of leak is identified as StrataCo Property Management of Burnaby BC, and their contractors, via Corbeau council. 

The matter has been referred to the appropriate authorities for investigation. Affected owners continue to be denied access to Corbeau’s official agenda and meeting minutes, and identified conflicts of interest remain unresolved.

End update 

...

CONFIDENTIAL – PREPARATORY INFORMATION DOCUMENT

For Submission to Authorities (Law Enforcement / Regulatory / Human Rights Bodies)

Document Status: Compilation of allegations and reported conduct for investigative assessment

Page: 8 of 9

1. SUBJECT OF CONCERN

Name: Allan Grandy

Affiliation: StrataCo Property Management

Role (alleged): Principal / Operator

Area of Activity: Lower Mainland, British Columbia

Status: Active (alleged)

2. OVERVIEW OF ALLEGATIONS (UNPROVEN)

Homeowners across multiple StrataCo-managed properties report serious and long-standing concerns regarding Allan Grandy’s role in governance, financial oversight, data handling, intimidation practices, and systemic denial of homeowners’ statutory and human rights.

Allegations describe a pattern of secrecy, refusal to disclose financial or corporate information, lack of audits, intimidation of complainants, and misuse or misdirection of homeowner funds. These allegations are presented without determination of guilt and solely for investigative and regulatory consideration.

Investigators are reportedly unable to rule out the possibility that StrataCo Property Management may be engaged in misuse of homeowner funds in a manner potentially consistent with misappropriation or other forms of financial misconduct. This reference is made for investigative context only and does not constitute a factual determination.

3. ALLEGED GOVERNANCE AND DISCLOSURE FAILURES

Reported concerns attributed to the subject include allegations of:

Operating strata management activities without adequate regulatory oversight

Refusal or failure to produce corporate records, disclose conflicts of interest, or provide financial accountability upon request

Long-standing undisclosed conflicts of interest

Failure to attend owner meetings or participate in on-record accountability processes

Lack of transparency regarding decision-making, expenditures, or corporate governance

These reported practices, if substantiated, may be inconsistent with statutory obligations governing strata management and duties associated with control over entrusted funds and decision-making authority.

4. ALLEGED FINANCIAL IRREGULARITIES

Financial-related allegations include:

Receipt, control, and administration of homeowners’ funds for extended periods without adequate reporting or verification

Refusal to answer questions regarding expenditures, budgeting, or financial controls

Absence of audits or independent third-party financial review across StrataCo-managed properties

Routine passage of levies without meaningful ownership oversight or informed consent

Movement or transfer of homeowner funds to destinations not disclosed to contributing owners

These practices are described by complainants as inconsistent with accepted standards of financial stewardship and, if substantiated, may engage concerns relating to misappropriation, breach of trust, or improper use of entrusted funds.

5. ALLEGED INTIMIDATION, COERCION, AND RETALIATION

Homeowners report allegations that:

Owners requesting audits, records, or accountability become targets of intimidation or adverse treatment

Some owners continue paying fees under perceived pressure or fear of negative consequences

Complaints or allegations of breach of trust are dismissed, ignored, or obstructed

Individuals raising concerns are exposed to harassment, threats, or other coercive conduct by strata representatives

Unwanted communication, stalking, and surveillance are reported

If substantiated, such conduct may be consistent with attempts to induce compliance through pressure, threats, or other forms of compulsion. As noted in Section 6, some complainants further allege that access to personal information may be used to facilitate or reinforce such conduct.

6. ALLEGED PRIVACY AND DATA MISUSE

Reported allegations include:

Collection, use, or disclosure of homeowners’ personal information without knowledge or consent

Unauthorized sharing of personal data with undisclosed third parties

Refusal to identify recipients of homeowners’ personal information upon request

Systemic failures to comply with applicable privacy and data-protection obligations

Refusal to provide Owners List since 2010

Additional reported concerns include:

Alleged use of homeowners’ personal information (including contact details, financial status, complaint history, or ownership records) to identify and target specific individuals

Allegations that such information has been used, directly or indirectly, to exert pressure on homeowners who request audits, raise complaints, or seek governance transparency

Reported patterns in which personal or sensitive information may be leveraged to communicate or imply adverse consequences unless certain actions are taken or refrained from

These reported practices may intersect with the intimidation and coercion concerns outlined in Section 5. If substantiated, such conduct could be consistent with obtaining compliance or advantage through threats, accusations, or other forms of pressure, which may engage provisions relating to extortion under applicable law.

This document does not make a legal determination but highlights the reported pattern for investigative review.

7. ALLEGED FAILURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE NORMS

Complainants report that StrataCo-managed properties allegedly lack:

Routine audits

Transparent complaint resolution processes

Documented owner-engagement meetings

Good-faith efforts to resolve disputes or clarify financial and governance concerns

It is alleged that this creates an environment where accountability mechanisms are absent, ineffective, or inaccessible.

8. RESPONSE TO ALLEGATIONS (REPORTED)

Homeowners report that when allegations of fraud, breach of trust, discrimination, or misuse of funds are raised:

The subject does not respond or provide clarification

No corrective, investigative, or disclosure process is initiated

Requests for transparency remain unanswered

9. SYSTEMIC RISK CONTEXT (REPORTED)

Across multiple submissions, complainants describe a pattern suggesting:

Concentrated and prolonged control over funds and personal data

Suppression or obstruction of owner oversight mechanisms

Repeated resistance to audits, disclosures, or regulatory review

Potential risk of continued financial, legal, and privacy-related harm to homeowners

This section is provided for contextual awareness only and does not constitute a factual determination.

10. STANDING REQUEST TO SUBJECT (REPORTED)

Contributors request that the subject place the compiled investigative report on meeting agendas for all StrataCo-managed properties to allow full disclosure and ownership review.

Contributors further request that independent and neutral third-party trustees or administrators be retained, where appropriate, to safeguard the interests of owners and strata corporations and to mitigate potential conflicts of interest.

11. DISCLAIMER

This document:

Contains allegations and reported patterns only

Does not assert proven facts or legal guilt

Uses conditional language to reflect that matters are unproven and subject to investigation

Is intended solely to assist authorities in determining whether investigation, regulatory review, or enforcement action is warranted