Alert - Eran Roubini unlicensed strata manager

Update: March 22, 2026

Reports have been submitted concerning repeated instances of unauthorized contact and privacy violations by suspect entities in possession of confidential owner information from Corbeau BCS2460. These entities are alleged to have engaged in intimidation and coercive tactics against homeowners exercising their lawful rights. Source of leak is identified as StrataCo Property Management of Burnaby BC, and their contractors, via Corbeau council. 

The matter has been referred to the appropriate authorities for investigation. Affected owners continue to be denied access to Corbeau’s official agenda and meeting minutes, and identified conflicts of interest remain unresolved.

End update 

...

CONFIDENTIAL – PREPARATORY INFORMATION DOCUMENT

For Submission to Authorities (Law Enforcement / Regulatory Bodies)

Document Status: Compilation of allegations and reported conduct for investigative review

Page: 2 of 9

1. SUBJECT OF CONCERN

Name: Eran Roubini

Affiliation: StrataCo Property Management

Location: Burnaby, British Columbia

Role (alleged): Unlicensed strata manager

Area of Activity: Lower Mainland, BC

Abuses active and ongoing

2. OVERVIEW OF ALLEGATIONS (UNPROVEN)

Multiple homeowners and residents across several strata corporations report a long-standing pattern of misconduct attributed to Eran Roubini (and predecessors) while acting in a strata management capacity.

The allegations span more than a decade (including his predecessors) and include claims of privacy breaches, repeated harassment, intimidation, stalking and surveillance, obstruction of statutory rights, cyber-hacking, destruction of corporate records, and human rights violations. These allegations are presented without determination of guilt and are intended solely for assessment by appropriate authorities.

Investigators are reportedly unable to rule out the possibility that StrataCo Property Management may be engaged in misuse of homeowner funds consistent with a Ponzi-style scheme across multiple properties in Lower Mainland. This remains an allegation requiring formal investigation.

3. ALLEGED MISCONDUCT AND IRREGULARITIES

Reported conduct attributed to the subject includes:

Failure/Refusal to make full disclosures

Operating with undisclosed conflict-of-interest 

Unauthorized disclosure of homeowners’ personal and private information to unknown third parties

Refusal to identify recipients of disclosed personal data

Repeated denial of lawful requests for strata records and information

Failure or refusal to produce customer history reports

Alleged interference, deletion or tampering with homeowner correspondence, including incoming emails, denial of access to agendas, meetings, minutes 

Alleged interference with virtual participation at Annual and Special General Meetings (AGMs/SGMs), including Zoom access disruptions

Alleged destruction or loss of up to 17 years of strata corporate records and historical data

Refusal to disclose documentation related to surveillance or monitoring of homeowners

Alleged role as an accessory to extortion

Alleged human rights violations against homeowners

Roubini refuses to acknowledge these complaints against him, refuses to acknowledge breach of trust claims, refuses to cease and desist these criminal acts against StrataCo's homeowner-victims 

4. PATTERN OF ALLEGED INTIMIDATION AND STALKING

A recurring pattern has been reported across multiple properties involving intimidation of homeowners who raise concerns related to audits, financial transparency, fraud, or statutory compliance.

Reported methods include:

Deployment of unknown individuals to homeowners’ residences

Unannounced door visits under the pretext of delivering notices or flyers

Leaving unwanted communication, surveillance 

Testing of door handles during these visits

In some reported cases, unauthorized entry occurred when doors were unlocked

False allegations and ad hominem attacks of their customer-victims  

These actions are described as targeted and selective, focusing on homeowners who request audits, raise concerns about financial practices, or assert statutory or human rights.

5. ALLEGED RETALIATION AGAINST DISSENTING OWNERS

Homeowners report that individuals who:

Raise concerns about suspected fraud or audits

Request access to strata records

Question proxy validity or voting procedures

Protest alleged misconduct by withholding fees

are systematically subjected to heightened scrutiny, harassment, intimidation, or denial of services and information including Unlawful acts of Foreclosure and Extortion 

6. GOVERNANCE AND ELECTION IRREGULARITIES (ALLEGED)

Review of corporate records & Reports of governance concerns include:

Failure to verify proxies at AGMs and SGMs

Absence of independent scrutineers

Potential manipulation of meeting outcomes

Lack of transparency in voting and decision-making processes

Refuses to record meetings, issues "nonsense" minutes 

7. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH BC STRATA PROPERTY ACT (ALLEGED)

It is alleged that the subject:

Demonstrates limited or no adherence to requirements under the BC Strata Property Act

Obstructs owners’ statutory rights to records, complaints, and due process

Operates without meaningful accountability or accessible complaint mechanisms

8. PUBLIC SOURCE REFERENCES

Allegations consistent with public complaints and reviews attributed to StrataCo Property Management, including material originating from Google Reviews, Yelp (Screenshots, URLs, and timestamps to be appended separately)

9. COLLECTIVE ADVOCACY NOTICE

Reference: Panda Collective

The Panda Collective has requested assistance in documenting and escalating alleged human rights abuses by StrataCo Property Management affecting homeowners throughout the Lower Mainland.

Requested Review By:

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)

BC Housing

Applicable regulatory and human rights authorities

10. DISCLAIMER

This document:

Does not allege proven facts

Contains reported allegations and patterns only

Is intended solely to assist authorities in determining whether formal investigation, regulatory review, or enforcement action is warranted